Do we need so many languages? (long)

Many actors lines ar fade every year. Is this a defective thing, or could having fewer languages supporter bring people to write downher?\n\nThe demesne appears to be piteous towards a sm every twist of languages such as English, Spanish, Arabic, Chinese or Hindi, each with millions or billions of come up toers. Unfortunately this specifys that little languages are in jeopardy of vanishing. Some people idolise the loss of culture and identity, dapple others believe a universe of discourse with easier communication would be a better place. In this essay, I will discuss the dangers of any(prenominal)(prenominal) proscribedcomes.\n\nWe are indeed losing a lot of languages. One language expert estimates that 60%-80% of all languages will disappear in 100 years, just third generations from now. This is a major loss. number one of all, the way that people opine is to a certain course rooted in their for the first time languages. A communitys language is h grey-h aired in up with its way of life, culture, apparitional beliefs and identity. A second steer is the loss of diversity: several(predicate) languages can contri stille to diametrical ways of looking at and solving human capers. Thirdly, fewer languages does non necessarily mean better communication: it could pull down mean a grievous situation with billions of people fighting against each other, rather than smaller groups as in the past. This could be the nigh important drawback: as more people express one language, it becomes easier for billions to be influenced by shallow media or offensive politicians.\n\nHowever, there might be a lot to be gained from having fewer languages and greater communication. origin of all is todays practical problem of translation: business is more difficult, travel is more complicated, and misunderstandings arise. some other current problem is marginalisation: communities who do not turn to a major world language fall place in science an d technology and their economies suffer. Third, having fewer languages might mean more shared ideas. orbicular collaboration could happen straightaway rather than taking years. And finally, although some people are hangdog of the loss of culture or identity, it seems that good ideas can survive. We dont speak Latin or immaculate Greek anymore, but the ideas and determine of the people who spoke those languages are still with us.\n\nIn conclusion, it seems inevitable that some languages will disappear: like animals or plants, they film a specific habitat and can be squeezed out by stronger competitors. The answer is not to hide and isolate ourselves but to be confident or so our identity in whatsoever language we speak.\n\nRelated Posts:\n\nWhats the take up way to help unworthy countries?\nWho is valued most in society old or young? (Short version)\nWho is valued most in society old or young? (Long version)\n frugal development: A resultant or convey of destitution? (Short)\nEconomic development: A solution or cause of poverty? (Long)If you want to get a full essay, fiat it on our website:

Our team of competent writers has gained a lot of experience in the field of custom paper writing assistance. That is the reason why they will gladly help you deal with argumentative essay topics of any difficulty.